Session #142: One more, because The Road

The road goes on forever and the party never endsWelcome to the 142nd, and best anybody can tell last, gathering of The Session. I am the host and because this is the last decided to call it “One more for the road” — but if you prefer “Last Beers” that is fine. Per usual, any suggestion from the host is strictly optional, but here is mine: Pick a beer for the end of a life, an end of a meal, an end of a day, an end of a relationship. So happy or sad, or something between. Write about the beer. Write about the aroma, the flavor, and write about what you feel when it is gone.

Fact is, since I wrote that, I’ve been thinking more about the road part of “one more for the road” than beer, and Butch Hancock started showing up on my playlists more than Frank Sinatra. I think the first time I heard “If You Were a Bluebird” Joe Ely was singing, although you might know the Emmylou Harris version better. A bit:

If I was a highway,
I’d stretch alongside you
I’d help you pass by ways
That had dissatisfied you
If I was a highway,
Well I’d be stretchin’
I’d be fetchin’ you home

But as convincing as Jimmie Dale Gilmore (like Ely and Hancock a member of The Flatlanders) sounds explaining why he takes some credit for the song, it belongs to Hancock, who wrote it more than 40 years ago. Gilmore lays claim to the song because he says it come to Hancock in a dream in which Gilmore was singing it. Years after we heard Gilmore tell that story, I happened to end up standing next to Hancock while our children were hula hooping at a music festival. I asked him about Gilmore’s tail. Yes, he said, it came to him in a dream, but he was singing it himself. He sings the lead on “Thank God for the Road,” which he wrote in the aughts. Again a bit:

There’s the sky, here’s the earth
This is the road for all it’s worth
It’s a ribbon, it’s a river, it’s a wave
It’s an arrow and it’s a snake
It’s asleep and it’s awake
And it stretches from the cradle to the grave

Thank God for the road
And the stars that shine above it
No matter what you once thought of it
You always knew you’d come to love it

Thank God for the road
And those old telephone poles
A cup of coffee and a sweet roll
When you’re trying to save your own soul
Thank God for the road

Four years ago the topic for The Session was “Beer Travel.” Daria and I used to self-publish a newsletter called Beer Travelers that turned into a column for All About Beer. That was typically more about destinations, but the road is what got us there. For instance, this was first written for All About Beer in 2010 and repeated for Session #93.

Pivovar Eggenberg

The day before touring Pilsner Urquell we visited the town of Ceský Krumlov, a UNESCO World Heritage site and second only after Prague in our list of places to see in the Czech Republic. A couple of months before a friend told us to be sure to tour Pivovar Eggneberg, but not until we’d been walking through the narrow cobblestone streets for several hours did we discover the only tour of the day had already gone.

Before settling in at the brewery’s restaurant, located above the lagering cellars as it turns out, for a late lunch we headed over to peak through a closed gate into the brewery yard. What might best be described as a snack shack sat not far from the entry. A man inside waved and signaled us to come around the back, where he held the door open.

Two men greeted us in Czech. They spoke no English. We speak no Czech. The man obviously in charge pointed toward the beer taps and made it clear there would be only one draft choice, because like the food menus on the wall the other tap handles were for busier days. The beer turned out to be a slightly cloudy unfiltered pale lager. A dark beer was available in bottles. We had one of each, sitting on a narrow bench in the storage room. We continued to speak English, smile and gesture. He spoke Czech, smiled and gestured. Occasionally the second man, wearing a leather cowboy hat, mumbled a few words (he apparently had been drinking a while and eventually wandered off).

We somehow discovered the first had Eggenberg T-shirts for sale (fortunately we’d be able to do laundry soon, because like everything else in the small shack the shirt smelled like the inside of an ashtray) and when it came time to pay he pointed to numbers on the menu to let us know how much we owed. The beers cost about $2 for two half liters, the T-shirt $3.

We had more beer with lunch, but it didn’t taste as good as in that shack, a place we never would have ended up had we planned more carefully.

Sometimes the best tour is the tour not taken.”

Pardon one more song lyric (this from James McMurtry):

The hurricane party’s windin’ down
and we’re all waitin’ for the end
And I don’t won’t another drink,
I only want that last one again

I’d be happy to have that Eggenberg beer as this party winds down, but it isn’t an option. Instead an old friend produced for the season seems like a good choice. We were happy the other day to spot Great Divide Hibernation on the store shelves. Almost missed it because now it is packaged in a colorful can. This is a beer we used to save a bottle or two of for the next year because it ages gracefully (and once medaled at the Great American Beer Festival in the “aged” category). It might cellar just as well in cans, but I don’t expect to find out.

Hibernation pours a reddish mahogany, with a thick tan head and web-like lacing. Put on the right Christmas music and you might think nuts were roasting somewhere hearby. There is abudant chocolate on the nose, caramel and dark fruit adding complexity. Christmas-cake rich in the mouth with all the flavor promised by the aroma. Slightly boozy, with a long finish, lingering like the road ahead disappearing into the horizon.

So that’s a wrap for The Session. There’s always another road waiting. Always more beer. I’ll get to the last drops of Hibernation after typing this sentence, listening to the Flatlanders and seeing how many shared roads I can identify.

Session #142 announcement: One more for the road

The SessionFour thousand, two hundred and ninety nine days after I hosted the first Session one March 2, 2007 it comes to me to host what presumably will be the last on Dec. 7.

There was no exit strategy when I suggested this monthly gathering, but it was hard impossible to imagine it would still be going more than 11 years after 29 of us blogged about stout. Or, even using the Great American Beer Festival style guidelines, that there would be new styles to write about. But, a) we will depart without considering Brut IPA, and b) the topic each month turned away from specific styles long ago (only sometimes turning back).

Frank Sinatra: When Jay Brooks and I exchanged emails about the topic this month I flippantly suggested “Funeral Beers” seemed appropriate. You can call it “Last Beers” if you’d rather not think about how your friends might toast you when you no longer are participating. Or “One more for the road”* because that has a soundtrack.

Pick a beer for the end of a life, an end of a meal, an end of a day, an end of a relationship. So happy or sad, or something between. Write about the beer. Write about the aroma, the flavor, and write about what you feel when it is gone.

Add a link to your post Dec. 7 in the comments here, on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, wherever. I’ll give stragglers a couple of days and post a roundup Dec. 12.

*Yes, I know, the song’s title is “One For My Baby.”

The Session #141: Long live beer blogging

The SessionThe topic for The Session #141 is “The Future of Beer Blogging.” Because it comes with an announcement that it is time — past time, really — to recognize The Session has run its course (and maybe because when I tweeted a link to Jay Brooks’ post I used the words “sunset” – my bad) discussion popped up about if the demise of The Session is another sign that beer blogging is dead.

Not true.

My family and I are in a time zone far, far west of most of you and there are rain forests and crashing waves to see, so I will be brief. Those of us who decided to call it The Session when it began in 2007 never claimed it was a stammtisch. It was of the digital world. We didn’t all sit down together, beers in hand, for several rounds. If a member went missing for a gathering or two we didn’t worry about her or his health. We didn’t bitch about our kids or the neighbor’s dog.

It served multiple purposes, I suppose, but one reason I suggested it at the outset was to expand the number of blogs that readers were paying attention to. One of the six regular visitors to Appellation Beer might drop in an see what was being written at Beer Haiku Daily (the host of the eighth session, and, like many early hosts, long gone). This might also be called listening to more voices.

Perhaps The Session could still serve that purpose, but for several years it has not.

So, to the “future of beer blogging.” I first typed, “I don’t care.” In fact, I do care, but my interest is the story. The delivery vehicle is just that. Have you ever listened to the town crier on a foggy morning in Lyme Regis? Great form of communication. Not so much today. Beer blogging will remain one way to engage readers/listeners/viewers going forward. As a fan of the written word, for now my preferred way. I’m excited that Jonathan Surratt has decided to drag RSBS (means nothing to you, right?) from the aughts into the teens and offer us ReadBeer. Call it diversity in beer storytelling.

And buy that man a cheeseburger.

What lives in the archives (thanks, Jay Brooks) of The Session is pretty terrific. Back in April of 2014 the topic was beer journalism. That’s what we should be talking about, and consider blogging as one outlet. Things about blogging have changed since 2007, but not that much. Blogs will continue to go and come. Mark Johnson nicely traced the life cycle a few weeks ago.

As to the future of Appellation Beer? Martyn Cornell put it better than I after the North American Guild of Beer Writers gave me what might be called a “lifetime achievement” award. Things have been quieter than quiet here, but I’ve been busy writing stories that have appeared or will appear elsewhere and on research for a couple of book projects. When I determine what regular posting means here then that will resume, and the about page will reflect the schedule.

I will likely miss The Session more than you. I didn’t make all of the 140 that came before this one, but more than most, including No. 140. How many were there for that one? What should that tell us?

Accept no substitute: These are not regular Monday beer links

I am flattered that Alan McLeod misses the Monday links and musing sometimes posted here, but I’m not inclined to resume weekly posts until I am certain they will be weekly. That might be December. But a few things I’ve read recently have me asking myself questions, and because here they are on a Monday it makes sense to include a few links.

Do breweries/wineries secretly value paying for writers to visit?
Alice Feiring began an interesting Twitter thread when she wrote, “I am troubled by the barrage social media of colleagues on cushy press trips.” Yep, we’ve seen that discussion within the context of beer writing many times on Twitter. But what struck me was this in the midst of the discussion. Sumita Sarma wrote, “Unless a press trip is paid for may by wineries or PR, you are never taken seriously as a writer.” Huh? Could this be true? Fortunately, in my experience it is not. But maybe I’ve been doing something wrong.

Is the IPA you just rated 4.5 really better than Blind Pig?
So why might ratings on everything from wine to products on Amazon products improve over time? According to Harvard Business Review: “The findings suggest that biased evaluations are the result of a misattribution process: If something feels easier to evaluate, people believe that it must actually be better. In other words, they misattribute their own feelings about evaluation (it feels easier to make an evaluation) onto their assessment of the actual merits (this thing must deserve a higher rating).” Just something to think about when flipping through your personal Untappd ratings or when to comparing them to others.

Read more