Session #57 announced: Beer Confessions

The SessionSteve Lamond has stepped up in a late lineup change to host The Session this month. He agreed to take Pete Brown’s scheduled place because Brown is recovering from a stolen laptop. The topic for #57 will be “Beery Confessions: Guilty Secrets/Guilty Pleasure Beer.”

One of the things I most enjoy about blogs and personal writing in general is the ability to have a window into another’s life, in a semi-voyeuristic way. So I’d like to know your beery guilty secrets. Did you have a particularly embarassing first beer (in the same way that some people purchase an atrocious song as their first record) or perhaps there’s still a beer you return to even though you know you shouldn’t? Or maybe you don’t subscribe to the baloney about feeling guilty about beers and drink anything anyway?

You’re also welcome to write about bad drinking experiences you’ve had as a result of your own indulgence or times when you’ve been completely wrong about a beer but not yet confessed to anyone that you’ve changed your mind.

Its fairly wide open, take your pick. Variety is the spice of life as they say (and I hope there’s more than 57 of them…) Blogs are due this Friday (3rd November) but as its short notice I’ll accept submissions until next Friday (11th November), but as soon as your blog is uploaded post a link to it in here, or send me an email stephanos1986 AT gmail DOT com if you don’t have a blog and still want to contribute.

This might be the time for me to resuscitate the rumor I’ve thrown up in every state in the Lower 48.

Session #56 roundup posted

The SessionReuben Gray has posted the roundup for The Session #56: “Thanks to the Big Boys.”

A pretty good turnout for a topic Reuben feared wouldn’t generate much interest. Not everybody was inclined to actually thank the “Big Boys” (a category not everybody viewed the same way), at least without sarcasm dripping of their posts.

But Phil at Beersay was only briefly intimidated by the subject matter. “As this is my first dabble as a contributor to The Session and I have to confess to nearly backing out waiting for an easier topic,” he wrote. Then the inspiration came to him, not quite in a dream . . .

Pete Brown will host The Session #57. Look for his announcement soon.

Session #56: Here’s to institutional memory

“My belief is that many microbrewers lack institutional memory. They don’t know how big brewers have saved this industry.”

– Henry King (1921-2005)

The SessionEven though seven-plus years after I interviewed Henry King for a story in New Brewer magazine I think he’d notice how many “microbrewers” had acquired the political and business savvy he was talking about back then the fact is their fans have a little catching up to do.

This month the theme for The Session #56 is “Thanks to the Big Boys” (visit Reuben Gray’s The Tale of the Ale for a recap). Big, of course, is relative. Steve Lamond chose to write about Fuller’s. Here in the United States, Boston Beer and New Belgium are far larger, but generally considered small (OK, not by everybody, I get it).

Take a look at this list of the nation’s biggest breweries 50 years ago (courtesy of BeerHistory) and think about what they have in common.

Anheuser-Busch, Inc. 8,477,099
Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. 5,694,000
Falstaff Brewing Corp. 4,915,000
Carling Brewing Co. 4,822,075
Pabst Brewing Co. 4,738,000
P. Ballantine & Sons 4,408,895
Theo. Hamm Brewing Corp. 3,907,040
F & M Schaefer Brewing Co. 3,202,500
Liebmann Breweries 2,950,268
Miller Brewing Co. 2,376,543

Right. Most are gone. A graphic reminder that brewing is a business. One that Henry King served well. Consider this story from 1966:

The deaths of 16 men where linked to cobalt salts that Quebec’s Dow brewery put in its beer to promote foam stability. That caused liver damage among frequent drinkers, the brewery’s best customers, and Dow ended up closing.

After King learned the deaths were related to cobalt, he spent 72 hours locked in his office, always on the phone, talking to every brewer in the United States.

“In retrospect, for what I did, I probably could have been sued,” he said. “We gave the brewing industry 72 hours to discontinue the use of cobalt in their products. We never asked a brewer whether he used it or not. We just made him give us an affidavit to give to the government that said on a given date 72 hours later, he was not using cobalt.

“We beat the federal government by seven weeks. We reported the cobalt problem, we were out of it and no longer had production seven weeks before the Food and Drug Administration even got their act together on it.”

He acted decisively not just because it was good for the beer industry, but because it was right. When the nitrosamine proved to be a carcinogen in the 1970s, King again moved swiftly. The USBA spent $1 million buying all 2,600 brands of the beer on the market and had each analyzed.

“Then I asked every brewmaster what they were using,” he said. “Three of them gave me false reports. I called the president of the brewery and told them that they had 36 hours to clean up their act. Boy, were they furious.”

By then, King had put a medical advisory committee into place. The same committee laid the foundation for the USBA’s Alcoholic Beverage Medical Research Foundation, of which King was particularly proud

King retired from the USBA in 1983, and by then he’d been instrumental in getting the small brewers tax differential approved (in 1976). He returned to the industry in 1992, serving six years as executive director of the Brewers Association of America. The BAA, which served smaller breweries, merged with the Association of Brewers in 2005 to form the current Brewers Association.

Small brewers have plenty to thank Henry King for, and in a way he was a gift from the Big Boys.
.

Session #56 announced: ‘Thanks to the big boys’

The SessionReuben Gray has announced the topic for The Session #56. He’s calling it “Thanks to the big boys” and explains . . .

What I ‘m looking for is this. Most of us that write about beer do so with the small independent brewery in mind. Often it is along the lines of Micro brew = Good and Macro brew, anything brewed by the large multinationals is evil and should be destroyed. Well I don’t agree with that, though there may be some that are a little evil….

Anyway I want people to pick a large brewery or corporation that owns a lot of breweries. There are many to chose from. Give thanks to them for something they have done. Maybe they produce a beer you do actually like. Maybe they do great things for the cause of beer in general even if their beer is bland and tasteless but enjoyed by millions every day.

There is an alternative: “If you honestly have nothing good to say about a large brewer, then make something up. Some satire might be nice, It will be a Friday after all.”

October 7, as a matter of fact.

Session #55 theme: Fabulous beer art

The SessionCurtis at HopHeadSaid has asked us all to write about “fabulous world of beer art found on coasters, labels and caps” for The Session #55. The basics:

  • Choose your favorite label, coaster or cap art.
  • Scan, download or take a picture of your label, coaster or cap art.
  • Write a paragraph that explains your affinity to your entry. Your explanation can be as shallow as or as deep as you want.
  • If the brewery name or beer name is obscured be sure to label your entry to give credit where credit is due.
  • Please limit your entries to commercial examples. Homebrew labels will be a topic for another session.
  • Extra karma points will be awarded to those who write about two or more categories (label, coaster or cap art).
  • Post your blog entry on or before Friday, September 2, 2001 and e-mail your link to curtis [at] hopheadsaid [dot] com.
  • Plenty of options. I don’t think I’ve ever shown you the Hieronymus beer label we own. Or our collection of Sierra labels. I suspect, however, I’ll end up scanning a coaster. Coaster memories more often reflect context. The terroir of the moment.