Session #79: In which I struggle with the meaning of ‘beer culture’

The SessionSo much for planning ahead. The topic for The Session this month is “What the hell has America done to beer?” or “USA versus Old World Beer Culture.”

I’m not sure if that is one discussion or two, but without any thought toward today just Monday, responding to Boak and Bailey’s request to go long, I posted enough about “what the hell America is doing to beer?” to tide us over for a while.

But I struggle mightily with the notion there are only two beer culture tents: “USA” and “Old World.”

Is there a single American beer culture? So that we put the people drinking retro tall boys at a Chris Knight concert here, people paying $9 a pint in a Manhattan bar here, everybody in Portland (Maine or Oregon, take your pick) over there, tourists at the new Anheuser-Busch biergarten in St. Louis together with regulars at the Urban Chesnut Brewing beer garden four miles away . . . no, wait, those last two don’t belong together.

Pub contemplationAre beer drinkers in Berlin (HT to Evan Rail) and Bamberg part of the same beer culture? At a London “craft beer” bar and in a country pub? How about La Cave à Bulles in Paris and Omerta in Krakow (HT to “The Pocket Beer Guide: The Essential Handbook to the Very Best Beers in the World”)?

Are we talking beer cultures and beer subcultures? Should we be talking about beer culture as a subculture of a nation’s culture (or perhaps a region’s)?1 These strike me as more interesting questions. Ones that should be asked over beer — OK, over beer in a romantic Old World setting — rather than at 10:30 in the morning. That way you don’t feel as bad when you fail to come up with an answer.

Adrian Dingle volunteered to host The Session because he has an agenda, which he lays out in 2,000-plus words. There are things there to agree with. I’m no more thrilled about “best of” lists in wich 28 of the 25 beers contain 12% alcohol or more than when I railed against them in the past, but I’d be repeating myself. As well as reading Ding’s full post be sure to use the links in the comments following his original post. Unlike here, you’ll find actual answers to the question he posed.

When The Session began six-and-a-half years ago the idea was contributors would write to the same topic, maybe even a style, and also about a specific beer they were tasting. I’m not sure what this says about American beer culture, but last Sunday at Second City in Chicago I had a glass of Sierra Nevada Pale Ale that was as good as a glass of beer can be. Full of flavor, crisp, refreshing, and — yes — bitter. So I had another. Just as good. Full of flavor, crisp, refreshing, and — yes — bitter. End of tasting notes.

***

1 My answer would be whatever a beer culture is it is a subculture of a region’s culture. Try drinking two Double IPAs and saying that fast.

Session #78 roundup posted

The SessionJames Davidson at Beer Bar Band has posted the roundup for The Session 78: Elevator Pitch for Beer.

There was a whole lot of pitchin’ going one, a topic so popular that Lew Bryson returned to The Session for the first time in a while.

The roundup runs more than 2,500 words, which reminds me Boak and Bailey have suggested “going long” in September.

On Monday 2 September, we’re going to post something a bit longer than usual — at the very least 1,500 words — and we’d love it if you, fellow bloggers and writers, did the same.

Seems like a good idea.

Session #79 topic announced: What the hell has America done to beer?

The SessionHow’s this for a warning?

Host Adrian Dingle at Ding’s Beer Blog writes, “This probably won’t be pretty, and you’re probably not gonna like it much, but hey, what’s new?”

The topic: “What the hell has America done to beer?” AKA, “USA versus Old World Beer Culture.”

This makes more sense if you already follow @D_I_N_G on Twitter or read his blog.

Brace yourself for Sept. 6.

Session #78: Stop the elevator, I want to get off

The topic for The Session 78 is “Your Elevator Pitch for Beer.” This presents a problem for me: I’m an old dog and struggle with new tricks. You likely don’t care about that, so feel free to click on the arrow to start the 30 seconds of “elevator pitch” and then move on. The angst is optional.

The SessionYou already have this figured out, but this isn’t really a video or 30 seconds of multimedia content. However, while I would have been more comfortable with a 250-word post (the other option) I checked and it takes me a lot longer than 30 seconds to read 250 words out loud.

I like taking photos (and even occasionally attach them to tweets or post them to Instagram). And our daughter, Sierra, has patiently answered my questions about YouTube and channels. I’d want to better understand how the next generation will get information. But it seems I’m pretty much a 1,000 words kind of guy.

(As an aside, the last time I got on an elevator and somebody was holding a beer it was 5 o’clock in the morning at a National Homebrewers Conference. We didn’t talk. I was headed to the airport. He still wasn’t headed to bed.)

Anyway, making an elevator pitch implies a level of advocacy that doesn’t necessarily fit with the goals here. No doubt what I write in this space, and elsewhere, promotes the consumption of beer, but that’s not why I do it. I started this blog seven-plus years ago to explore when and how the where in a beer matters. There are still as many questions as answers. I’m going to keep asking.

Maybe I’ll eventually come up with a 30-second answer. It doesn’t seem likely. Even then, I promise, it will be safe to get on an elevator with me.

Session #77 wrapped up

The SessionJustin’s Brew Review has posted the roundup for The Session #77: Why IPA is a Big Deal. That 32 bloggers found time to write provides a bit of commentary unto itself.

Justin provides a summary, although (as always) reading the full post (and clicking a few links) is recommended:

1. HOPS! for the taste/flavor
2. Different than mass-produced “macro” beer
3. Hype/abundance of supply