TWTBWTW: What if micro meant micro?

Oregon hop pickers
Via the Oregon Hops & Brewing Archives (see below)

As always, here you will find a hodge podge of links to stories that recently struck my fancy, most often during the past week. To call it That Was The (Beer) Week That Was, as I did last week, suggests it might be a more complete roundup of beer news that it is. But because TWTBWTW kind of rolls of the tongue, or perhaps serves as a test to check just how much you’ve had too much to drink, I’m sticking with it.

THINGS ARE GREAT, UNLESS THEY AREN’T
Mostly sunny with a chance of occasional showers
“It’s time to break out your sunglasses beer folks.”

It’s going to be a ‘make-or-break’ year for struggling craft brewers
“It’s a good time to be super careful and super strategic because we’re facing rising prices in pretty much everything. We’re trying to think of where we want to be five years from now.”

Craft Beer Posts ‘Steepest’ Declines of Any Segment in the Off-Premise
Declines have accelerated to nearly -10% compared to the -6% decline in calendar year 2021, according to Bump Williams Consulting.

WHAT IF?
Micro-wineries
Napa Valley legislators recently gave final approval to the Micro-Winery Ordinance, which simplifies the permitting process for small producers who make up to 1,000 cases of wine per year. Operators of small breweries will read this story and immediately see parts of their own businesses.

It also got me thinking about micro and driving past liquor stores that advertise “microbrews” inside. Before there were craft breweries there were microbreweries. This wasn’t a legal designation. At the outset, and for record keeping purposes, the Institute of Brewing Studies (the predecessor of the Brewers Association) defined microbreweries as those that produce less than 10,000 barrels per year. That was raised to 15,000 barrels early on, where it remains today.

Read more

That was the (beer) week that was

That Was The Week That Was
I’m old enough that I remember the American version of That Was The Week That Was. Perhaps the hyper links in my brain got crossed, but that’s what I thought of when I spotted the first link here. Except I’m pretty sure it wasn’t intended as satire.

WHO’S COUNTING?
Only 4 ingredients in Bud Light? Yep, at least according to “8 Things You Should Know About Bud Light.” Hops, barley, water and are listed. Really, I read it at least five times. Kinda takes us back to time there was some confusion about the German Reinheitsgebot,

YES, BUT NO
There are good reasons to follow the suggestion in this headline: “Stop Drinking New Beers All The Time,” but I can’t go all in.

Here’s why. Outer Range Brewing makes beer about 60 miles west of ut. A lot of IPAs. They are very good at what they do, so there is no, “Hey, you should get better at this (or that)” first. A new IPA shows up, I might buy it. It will be interesting, something new, a little bit different. But it will still taste like an Outer Range beer. As humans we like what is familiar, but also what is different. Just not too different.

I could say the same thing about Halfway Crooks in Atlanta, although this time about pale lagers. Or . . .

NOSTALGIA
Speaking of our affection for the familiar.

Pop Music’s Nostalgia Obsession.

Best Bitter in a modern world.

14 icons. Beers to celebrate National Beer Day (last Thursday), itself a bit of nostalgia. Included were six hop forward beers and four imperial stouts. But what amused me most about the story is that Anchor Steam was listed as a “California common” when, because of trademarking it is the one historic steam beer that may be called a steam beer.

YOUR BRAIN ON BEER
L’Oréal has a high-tech headset “to help you find your most desired scent.” How cool would it be if a hop breeding company was able to put such a thing to work? This sounds at least as other worldly as flying cars: “During each unique consultation, the headset will grant its wearer cognitive reign to find their ideal fragrance, based on a series of responses to different proprietary scents. Technically speaking, it operates though machine learning algorithms that interpret the brain’s signals to accurately monitor behaviour and preferences in response to different fragrances. Essentially, it helps consumers determine the perfect scent suited to their emotions.”

Additional reading: Perfume cocktails.

BASEBALL IS BACK

Monday beer links: Reckoning ahead? Would it be crispy?

Scratch Brewing, Ava, Illinois
St. Louis-based Sauce magazine has six suggestions for brewery/hike combinations in Missouri and Illinois. Of course, Scratch Brewing is one of the destinations. The story would lose all credibility if it were not. We made time eight days ago to get to rural Ava and sample everything on tap. The beers were tasting as wonderful, maybe more wonderful, than always. That’s a fig porter (made with fig leaves, not the fruit) in the glass.

Now to the links . . .

Tin Whiskers, a brewery in Minnesota, is closing. “A lot of people are getting in that think it’s easy — easy money,” says Tin Whiskers owner Jeff Moriarty. “I feel like a bubble is coming — a reckoning is going to happen.”

The brewery, the last to operate in downtown St. Paul, has been in business eight years. There were plenty of local stories, but little additional insight. However, the discussion at Beer Advocate is pretty interesting.

Just so you know, two Dallas-Fort Worth breweries also closed last month. There was no mention of a reckoning.

ON LANGUAGE
In search of elegant wine. I saved this story because the headline grabbed my attention. Before I got around to reading it I thought a bit about what attributes in beer, or simply what beers, I might describe as elegant. I know I’ve used the word. Not a lot, but apparently without proper thought. Honestly, this story didn’t help a lot. However, perhaps you can take the suggestion about what makes a mathematical proof elegant and make use of it.

Crispy. Jeff Alworth chimes in on the use of the word crispy, a topic I already said what I have to say about in February.

There was a certain amount of conversation when he posted a link on Twitter.

Which was followed a tweet from Matthew Curtis about “beer writers policing language that becomes part of a drinkers vernacular” and more comments.

And eventually this from Alan McLeod:

“While I agree that policing is fundamentally silly there is possibly an underlying question: is there any meaningful standard upon which the self-appointed might do such a thing? For the best part of twenty years doing this, I am left with the impression that too much of what has been written about good beer has been larded with a sameness made up of business promotion, recycling of the works of others, forms of oversimplification** mixed with claims to expertise and a certain code compliance. Is ‘crispy’ an example of that code? Maybe. I don’t have an exact idea what is meant when used. But it’s not unique in that regard. And I’m not sure that is the point. It seems that circles of praise gather whenever someone achieves the great gold ring of getting paid for their written code compliant words, as if that is the main end of beer writing.”

After you consider the intriguing question McLeod raises — What is the main end of beer writing? — there is this.

In “Democracy, authenticity, and the enregisterment of connoisseurship in ‘craft beer talk’” (Language & Communications 75 (2020) author Lex Connelly draws a parallel between oinoglossia (wine talk) and brutoglossia, (craft) beer talk (just focus on the words that make sense to you).

My takeaway, further informed by non-beery books I’ve been reading, is likely different from yours what yours might be. I think there is more to this what’s going on than hipster affectations and peer skeptically over the tops of my my glasses when I come across sentences that contain these words: “the key kind of class distinction in late capitalism.”

So, I suggest that some beer drinkers (writers and citizens themselves) may use language, tasting rituals and what they view as the importance of authenticity to accrue cultural capital. In “Distinction,” French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu posits that cultural capital (as opposed to economic capital) is an accumulation of knowledge and skills that demonstrate social status.

(You know if you know. Guilty here.)

Anchor Brewing savior Fritz Maytag once said, “It’s very hard to get pretentious about beer. You can become knowledgeable and start to talk with a highfalutin’ vocabulary. But you can only go so far with beer, and I’ve always liked that.”

Perhaps, but beer drinkers who adopt specialized language (i.e. crispy boi) that means nothing to my neighbors may be as intent on collecting cultural capital as those who celebrate elegant wine. That’s fine, unless that capital is used as a weapon to exclude those without similar special knowledge from joining the craft beer club.

PUBS
The whole point. “The Ted Lasso pub is just a pub.” Locals in the UK take the pub for granted. Viewed from afar it is idyllic.

Pressing play. And so it begins, “Over the weekend, I travelled on a number of different trains to a couple of different pubs and beer events. It was the first time since the start of the pandemic that everything about the day felt part of a previous lifetime; one that had been merely paused for a couple of years and restarted.”

Double threat. What’s the greater danger? A 26-story going up next door to a 200-year-old pub and leaving it permanently in the shade or Heineken installing its own manager?


Click on the photo on the left for details.

Monday beer links: Make time for the first one

If breweries and beer, or craft breweries and craft beer if you are still a member of the movement, are going to save the world they must do better. The story about “How Sexism, Assault Pushed One Woman Out of the Beer Industry” is absolutely gutting.

And a part of the story not to be overlooked is this.

“It’s exhausting to keep telling this fucking story,” (Sarah) Hite says, adding that between 2020 and 2021, she and a trusted industry peer contacted two journalists about her experiences. Hite had given an interview to one of these journalists, but neither published stories about it. She says the reporter who interviewed her eventually stopped communicating with her.

Make time to read the whole story.

#FOODIES
Interview with a master cicerone
So long, Chowhound
There’s this: In his conversation with Em Sauter, master cicerone Shane McNamara says, “I like to think of this journey as the same of what people describe as becoming a ‘foodie.’”

And this: Writing about the announcement that Chowhound website will close next week, Eric Asimov explains that the site was “a neighborhood hangout for food adventurers — chowhounds, (founder Jim) Leff called them, distinguishing them from dilettantish foodies — to indulge their opinionated obsessions among a like-minded community.”

Leff clearly is not pro “foodie.” I admit this is piling on, but there is also this from the foreword of “Foodies: Democracy and Distinction in the Gourmet Foodscape.”

“(The authors) show the pursuit of social status that underlies the false egalitarianism of foodies’ claims to like humble dishes. They know that we are really luxuriating in our sense of entitlement, and that every claim to like simple food is a means of asserting our distinction.”

Does that sound inclusive?

Bonus reading: Leff wrote a series of blog posts about selling Chowhound. Start here.

THE EARLY DAYS
A long conversation with Alan Sprints, who recently announced he will soon close his Hair of the Dog brewery. This: “It was very frustrating that having good beer wasn’t enough. It wasn’t even the second or third most important thing. It was always so frustrating that I had to work so hard, and yet I never was financially very successful. Critical success came early on, and that sustained me for quite a few years, but financial success is the reason you get into business in the first place.”

AUTHENTICITY
Bringing Ancient Beer Back to Life in the Modern World
This is true: “If history, as they say, is told by the victors, rebrews can either reinforce or challenge cultural narratives.” And that may be more important than perfectly replicating the flavor of an ancient.”

“Re-creation beers, whether authentic or not, illuminate our understanding of beer and culture, and show us that we are actually very similar to our ancestors; beer is still a ubiquitous influence in our lives today,” George Schwartz wrote in a Beer History magazine essay in 2013 that examined the importance of authenticity in modern versions of historic ales. “What unifies these projects — whether they are derived from archaeological artifacts, scientific research, or archival documents — is a strong desire to connect with the past.”

PUBS
Drinking with the Simpsons
After you read this new story about the popularity of Moe’s Taverns in South America, consider Samer Khudairi’s essay about how The Simpsons taught him about beer and drinking.

Surveying the literature of the pub
“It has also long been a favored site and subject for English literature. Some writers have dramatized the pub as a male-only space. For others, it has been a staging ground for transgression, where the norms of behavior break down. The pub has meant shame, dissolution, pleasure, companionship, and the artifice of companionship. A mutable mini-England on every high street.”

FUTURE READING
The North American Guild of Beer Writers announced the 2022 “diversity in beer writing” grant recipients, as well as the topics each of them will be writing about. Cool stuff.