<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The challenge of getting history right</title>
	<atom:link href="http://appellationbeer.com/blog/the-challenge-of-getting-history-right/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://appellationbeer.com/blog/the-challenge-of-getting-history-right/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:38:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Mullins</title>
		<link>http://appellationbeer.com/blog/the-challenge-of-getting-history-right/comment-page-1/#comment-192124</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Mullins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appellationbeer.com/blog/?p=995#comment-192124</guid>
		<description>Mckinley Morganfield, I presume!
Keith Richards, like many other human beings, can be considered extremely unreliable as a witness...for obvious reasons...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mckinley Morganfield, I presume!<br />
Keith Richards, like many other human beings, can be considered extremely unreliable as a witness&#8230;for obvious reasons&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://appellationbeer.com/blog/the-challenge-of-getting-history-right/comment-page-1/#comment-192084</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appellationbeer.com/blog/?p=995#comment-192084</guid>
		<description>This sort of thing pops up in evidence in law once in a while.  One of the reasons there are juries is the understanding that people see and recall things differently do  to the combination of our imperfect capacity and that each of us have a different experience that informs the imperfect capacity.  There is seldom a &quot;right answer&quot; but, as Ron Pattinson exemplifies, there are often better answers - which are sometimes not the accepted truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sort of thing pops up in evidence in law once in a while.  One of the reasons there are juries is the understanding that people see and recall things differently do  to the combination of our imperfect capacity and that each of us have a different experience that informs the imperfect capacity.  There is seldom a &#8220;right answer&#8221; but, as Ron Pattinson exemplifies, there are often better answers &#8211; which are sometimes not the accepted truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

