<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 1968 Hardy&#8217;s &#8211; It didn&#8217;t suck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://appellationbeer.com/blog/the-1968-hardys-it-didnt-suck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://appellationbeer.com/blog/the-1968-hardys-it-didnt-suck/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 16:56:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan Hieronymus</title>
		<link>http://appellationbeer.com/blog/the-1968-hardys-it-didnt-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-119360</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan Hieronymus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 19:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appellationbeer.com/blog/the-1968-hardys-it-didnt-suck/#comment-119360</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Makes you wonder how the flavors change from year to year. I wonder when it’s peak was.&lt;/em&gt;

Smoke related, Daria kept getting the adhesive element, somewhat like an Islay whisky.

When the beer was first brewed in 1968 it was a special, not planned as an annual, and the boast of &quot;good for 25 years&quot; seemed awfully bold. Lots of bottle to bottle variation, of course.

We were kidding last night that it peaked last year and we shouldn&#039;t have waited so long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Makes you wonder how the flavors change from year to year. I wonder when it’s peak was.</em></p>
<p>Smoke related, Daria kept getting the adhesive element, somewhat like an Islay whisky.</p>
<p>When the beer was first brewed in 1968 it was a special, not planned as an annual, and the boast of &#8220;good for 25 years&#8221; seemed awfully bold. Lots of bottle to bottle variation, of course.</p>
<p>We were kidding last night that it peaked last year and we shouldn&#8217;t have waited so long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://appellationbeer.com/blog/the-1968-hardys-it-didnt-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-119358</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 19:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appellationbeer.com/blog/the-1968-hardys-it-didnt-suck/#comment-119358</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s glaringly obvious I didn&#039;t read yesterday&#039;s post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s glaringly obvious I didn&#8217;t read yesterday&#8217;s post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://appellationbeer.com/blog/the-1968-hardys-it-didnt-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-119357</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appellationbeer.com/blog/the-1968-hardys-it-didnt-suck/#comment-119357</guid>
		<description>(Hmm, my first comment didn&#039;t go through)

This reminds me of a great post I read on Tomme Arthur&#039;s blog.  He got a smokey combination of soy sauce, cider and vinegar.

Makes you wonder how the flavors change from year to year.  I wonder when it&#039;s peak was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Hmm, my first comment didn&#8217;t go through)</p>
<p>This reminds me of a great post I read on Tomme Arthur&#8217;s blog.  He got a smokey combination of soy sauce, cider and vinegar.</p>
<p>Makes you wonder how the flavors change from year to year.  I wonder when it&#8217;s peak was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://appellationbeer.com/blog/the-1968-hardys-it-didnt-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-119356</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 19:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appellationbeer.com/blog/the-1968-hardys-it-didnt-suck/#comment-119356</guid>
		<description>whoops, you already linked there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whoops, you already linked there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brewer a</title>
		<link>http://appellationbeer.com/blog/the-1968-hardys-it-didnt-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-119306</link>
		<dc:creator>brewer a</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 14:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appellationbeer.com/blog/the-1968-hardys-it-didnt-suck/#comment-119306</guid>
		<description>So does this get entered under 1968 vintage?  I&#039;m just worried that the database will be inaccurate if it doesn&#039;t get it&#039;s own listing.  Especially since &#039;67 and &#039;69 were sooooo overrated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So does this get entered under 1968 vintage?  I&#8217;m just worried that the database will be inaccurate if it doesn&#8217;t get it&#8217;s own listing.  Especially since &#8217;67 and &#8217;69 were sooooo overrated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

