<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Men&#8217;s Journal &#8216;best beers&#8217; redux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://appellationbeer.com/blog/mens-journal-best-beers-redux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://appellationbeer.com/blog/mens-journal-best-beers-redux/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:38:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loren</title>
		<link>http://appellationbeer.com/blog/mens-journal-best-beers-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-48925</link>
		<dc:creator>Loren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appellationbeer.com/blog/mens-journal-best-beers-redux/#comment-48925</guid>
		<description>Remember too, DFH uses Ringwood yeast plus this is filtered now so it is WAY more mellow than it used to be. Plus it&#039;s got some mellow Simcoe bittering action going on. Plus Warrior, which is also mellow.

Maybe if they called it an English IPA?

[ducking]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember too, DFH uses Ringwood yeast plus this is filtered now so it is WAY more mellow than it used to be. Plus it&#8217;s got some mellow Simcoe bittering action going on. Plus Warrior, which is also mellow.</p>
<p>Maybe if they called it an English IPA?</p>
<p>[ducking]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveH</title>
		<link>http://appellationbeer.com/blog/mens-journal-best-beers-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-48694</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 19:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appellationbeer.com/blog/mens-journal-best-beers-redux/#comment-48694</guid>
		<description>Trumer Pils -- maybe we can default this one a little?  ;)

60 Minute -- The web site might say 60 IBUs, but it&#039;s a pretty mellow 60, at least in the last tap I had.  But I&#039;ve always found it pretty easy drinking, and nowhere near as malty as one might expect in an IPA.  Dunno, but I put it next to SNPA as a nice quaffer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trumer Pils &#8212; maybe we can default this one a little?  <img src='http://appellationbeer.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>60 Minute &#8212; The web site might say 60 IBUs, but it&#8217;s a pretty mellow 60, at least in the last tap I had.  But I&#8217;ve always found it pretty easy drinking, and nowhere near as malty as one might expect in an IPA.  Dunno, but I put it next to SNPA as a nice quaffer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan Hieronymus</title>
		<link>http://appellationbeer.com/blog/mens-journal-best-beers-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-48683</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan Hieronymus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 18:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appellationbeer.com/blog/mens-journal-best-beers-redux/#comment-48683</guid>
		<description>2 Victory Prima Pils, 3 Stoudt&#039;s Pils, 4 Trumer Pils, 5 New Belgium Blue Paddle.

Dogfish: Their website says the 60 Minute is 60 IBUs. Might you be guilty of a little palate drift in calling this a pale ale?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 Victory Prima Pils, 3 Stoudt&#8217;s Pils, 4 Trumer Pils, 5 New Belgium Blue Paddle.</p>
<p>Dogfish: Their website says the 60 Minute is 60 IBUs. Might you be guilty of a little palate drift in calling this a pale ale?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveH</title>
		<link>http://appellationbeer.com/blog/mens-journal-best-beers-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-48626</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appellationbeer.com/blog/mens-journal-best-beers-redux/#comment-48626</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;They make good beer choices&lt;/i&gt;

What are the 4 others under Lager/Pils?

I agree that all the beers listed make up a good selection of beer to taste, but I also have to agree with your comment, &lt;i&gt;&quot;Looks like they are running for office and out to please every voting group.&lt;/i&gt; in an overall view of the lists.  Except maybe the Pale Ale.  ;)

A local just got the 60 Minute on tap; it&#039;s very nice (as always), but I still don&#039;t understand why they call it an IPA.  Marketing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;They make good beer choices</i></p>
<p>What are the 4 others under Lager/Pils?</p>
<p>I agree that all the beers listed make up a good selection of beer to taste, but I also have to agree with your comment, <i>&#8220;Looks like they are running for office and out to please every voting group.</i> in an overall view of the lists.  Except maybe the Pale Ale.  <img src='http://appellationbeer.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>A local just got the 60 Minute on tap; it&#8217;s very nice (as always), but I still don&#8217;t understand why they call it an IPA.  Marketing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan Hieronymus</title>
		<link>http://appellationbeer.com/blog/mens-journal-best-beers-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-48614</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan Hieronymus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appellationbeer.com/blog/mens-journal-best-beers-redux/#comment-48614</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Not a defense&lt;/strong&gt; but they did contact brewers, bar owners, journalists. I didn&#039;t see the panel listed in the magazine, but it was impressive. 

They make good beer choices - aside from not finding a worthy European lager - it is just the ranking that I find humorous.

And I wonder how often they revisit these beers. Brooklyn Black Chocolate Stout (the beer that got listed twice and certainly is worthy) is listed at 8%. The bottle I bought last winter was 10.6%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Not a defense</strong> but they did contact brewers, bar owners, journalists. I didn&#8217;t see the panel listed in the magazine, but it was impressive. </p>
<p>They make good beer choices &#8211; aside from not finding a worthy European lager &#8211; it is just the ranking that I find humorous.</p>
<p>And I wonder how often they revisit these beers. Brooklyn Black Chocolate Stout (the beer that got listed twice and certainly is worthy) is listed at 8%. The bottle I bought last winter was 10.6%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveH</title>
		<link>http://appellationbeer.com/blog/mens-journal-best-beers-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-48605</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appellationbeer.com/blog/mens-journal-best-beers-redux/#comment-48605</guid>
		<description>Whenever lists like this come out in a magazine not really devoted to food and/or drink, I always wonder just &lt;i&gt;who&lt;/i&gt; the list makers are and what their beer-drinking chops really are (of course, that&#039;s sort of how I read BeerAdvocate, but that&#039;s another story).

Hmm, a worthy European lager...that might be a tough one Stan.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whenever lists like this come out in a magazine not really devoted to food and/or drink, I always wonder just <i>who</i> the list makers are and what their beer-drinking chops really are (of course, that&#8217;s sort of how I read BeerAdvocate, but that&#8217;s another story).</p>
<p>Hmm, a worthy European lager&#8230;that might be a tough one Stan.  <img src='http://appellationbeer.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

